Oh I get it, things were especially bad when Jo Ann Hardesty, and her predecessor Chloe Eudaly, were in charge of PBOT. They would simply deprioritize or not respond to those reports at all. Had our coward mayor just removed them from PBOT leadership things wouldn’t have been as bad for as long.
Nowadays, PBOT responds within 2-3 days. You can see on the city’s arcgis map where reports are, how long they’ve been there and how many duplicate reports there are.
Last I checked they aren’t making homelessness illegal. They are banning camping during the day, which unfortunately is needed because campsites quickly become biohazards. Source: had disgusting, expanding camp in front of my house for 25 months - including 2 deaths, 2 ODs, 5 stolen cars, a bunch of recovered stolen property and 2 DV incidents where I thought one woman was being murdered.
Good.
There needs to be real solutions. Forced rehab, and publicly owned housing, and nobody from the city to the state to the federal level are talking about those things.
We need the equivalent of a GI Bill to entice people to become healthcare workers that will have to deal with basically some of the worst elements of human society - and anyone arguing that point has probably never had an addict for a sibling or parent. Addicts need love, but some addicts are hard to spend any time around. Alcohol and meth top that hard-to-be-around category.
Officials believe that the group had purchased a powder that they snorted together, apparently unaware that it contained fentanyl.
The national overdose rate for opiates had a huge upswing in 2019, according to published NIH and OHA data.
Another interesting point is that OD deaths equate to less than 2% of the number of people, measured over the same period, that would have had criminal records due to possession in Oregon (or 0.2% of the population).
The recent comparison between how Portugal was able to succeed, versus Oregon (and the US in general) wasn’t very surprising - except for the part about how the actual ticketing & law enforcement process was largely a failure. Portuguese authorities suggested that most of the people brought into the deterrence program weren’t addicts, but mostly vacationers who were partying. Conversely, they said that the biggest influence on their success was that they poured an incredible amount of money into the social services needed for addiction treatment and they had safe sites for use - both of which will be impossible in the US.
I don’t disagree. I’ve said for a couple of decades that we need to tie the GI Bill directly to the draft and create a different form of the GI Bill specifically for public service.
There’s plenty of ways to serve your country, not all of them have to involve killing brown people in foreign lands.