Hello! This is a discussion thread for the proposed FEP-61cf: The OpenWebAuth Protocol. Please use this thread to discuss the proposed FEP and any potential problems or improvements that can be addressed. Summary OpenWebAuth is the “single sign-on” mechanism used by Hubzilla, (streams) and other related projects. It allows a browser-based user to log in to services across the Fediverse using a single identity. Once logged in, they can be recognised by other OpenWebAuth-compatible services, ...
This is the proposed FEP-61cf: The OpenWebAuth Protocol. OpenWebAuth is the “single sign-on” mechanism used by Hubzilla, (streams) and other related projects. It allows a browser-based user to log in to services across the Fediverse using a single identity. Once logged in, they can be recognised by other OpenWebAuth-compatible services, …
You must log in or register to comment.
A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.
Fediverse is a portmanteau of “federation” and “universe”.
Getting started on Fediverse;
- What is the fediverse?
- Fediverse Platforms
- How to run your own community
- 0 users online
- 6 users / day
- 20 users / week
- 72 users / month
- 298 users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 1.02K Posts
- 13.6K Comments
- Modlog
- mods:
The proposal fails to sufficiently motivate why existing protocols like OpenId Connect can’t be used given that trusting the user’s home instance seems necessary with this protocol too. The name also is confusingly close to WebAuthn.
This looks really odd in relation to other fediverse software; Why
/magicand required to be on the root of the domain? Why hard-require routing the domain part of the user ID when.well-known/webfingerexists? Why is there aX-Open-Web-Authheader which the spec only describes as “its purpose is unclear from the code”?So many questions.
I definitely like the idea of distributed sign-in, Solid did a decent work of that many years ago after all. This particular proposal just looks rather odd.
The author wrote this FEP by reverse engineering the Hubzilla implementation. The point of proposing it is to find and answer questions like these.
I agree, and
.well-known/webfingeris already largely adopted, we should build upon what we already have, not creating even more standards.OpenWebAuth has been in use on the fediverse since before WebFinger became so widely used.
Like I said in a previous comment, this FEP was written by reverse engineering the existing implementation. It’s still a proposal so it still has to go through a discussion period where issues like this can be worked out and it can be updated
Oh I see. Thanks!