The level of expected support for those is a lot greater.

I wonder if there is cludgy workaround to make groups just another user for the rest of the fediverse

I feel like it goes with the law and order cadence too lol

I think a centralized view of knowledge that Wikipedia provides is great, plus the record of changes and discussions help capture some of the nuances people are aiming for.

That said where this really accelerates is when bias is wanted. For example the Arch wiki vs Debian wiki vs Wikipedia all SHOULD have biases that cater to their specific audience, even if there is obvious overlap.

Interestingly use of wikidata could help create aknowlledge graph associating parts of the fediwikiverse and we might be able to see a dream of mine ; dynamic knowledge content. Where I might be an expert in databases so I can get the condensed version of how postgres but get the beginners version of kubernetes on an article about deploying them together

Really interestingly would be to see it restart up but with ONDC support so that sellers/vendors can be automatically added from that network.

Code is still there, which is a nice thing about opensource, but they definitely should be looked at for lessons on the idea of trying to build a decentralized marketplace.