Somewhere between Linux woes, gaming, open source, 3D printing, recreational coding, and occasional ranting.
π Me, but elsewhere
π¬π§ / π©πͺ
The thing is, Meta does not care about community safety, or moderation, or protecting user data. (Fun fact: they donβt have a data protection agreement, but a data usage agreement.) All they care about is how they can get the most money out of something. Killing off things left and right of their path.
The question is not IF Meta kills the Fediverse but only WHEN they do it.
I know about muenster.im which is a Mastodon instance specific to the city of MΓΌnster. There is also mastodon.hamburg for example.
Those are not local-by-default social media services, though. But I guess itβs easier to find an instance with a local focus instead of βJodel but federatedβ.
This happens very often here. lemmy.ml isnβt reliable and the performance is very bad.
I still donβt get their target audience for Threads.
Facebook users donβt want to leave their weird boomer Internet bubble. Instagram users will continue posting pictures on Instagram and advertise their linktr.ee
account where they link to their 18+ content because theyβre not allowed to link in directly from Instagram, and π users β¦ well β¦ they will continue using π.
Ironically the only ones wo really care about Threads is people in the Fediverse.
Daily reminder to defederate from and block
threads.net
(and optionally all instances that do not do the same).