Interested in Linux, FOSS, data storage systems, unfucking our society and a bit of gaming.
I help maintain Nixpkgs.
https://github.com/Atemu
https://reddit.com/u/Atemu12 (Probably won’t be active much anymore.)
The link you posted is a post by a mod announcing that they will enforce the policy given to them by the LW admins.
From the modlog I can tell that (presumably) you posted a text post to !politics@lemmy.world about the policy that was then removed.
If you’re posting to !politics@lemmy.world, such posts would obviously be removed because that’s A. not on topic (that’d be a topic for !lemmyworld@lemmy.world. ) and B. not a link to an article. The latter is also the reason given for the removal.
Stirring up drama over absolutely nothing usually ends up hurting someone. Could you not?
I can’t remember the last time I saw a graph starting at a non-zero value where it showed anything other than noise whereas they almost always skew my initial impression of the data. If there’s no point in doing it but a major downside, I see no point in having them for any reason other than to mislead people.
I’d see this to be implemented in Lemmy itself. Hashtags are a global thing, not instance-specific, and should already be available to Lemmy via AP.
Lemmy would “just” need the ability to display a hashtag as a “community” containing posts made under that hashtag. Question is what to do with replies but given Lemmys design, they could probably simply be left out because, if it’s truly on-topic, the post will likely contain the hashtag too and therefore land in the hashtag “community”.
I thought it’d be issue/MR discussions because that’d be a fairly obvious application of AP but it’s actually for MRs themselves? Wow.
Git forges are the only remaining non-federated social platforms that I still heavily use.
With AP, we might finally be able to build a forge network that could become a viable public hosting alternative to GitHub.
For me it says @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz, not @null. Clicking on your comment’s Fediverse button to take me to your instance still shows the same.
Why would I do that when paperless already does OCR through ocrmypdf internally?
My problem is not the steps before or after the conversion to PDF but the conversion to PDF itself. Getting an image into a PDF isn’t a trivial manner from the technical side, especially if you care about preserving its content.
Always has been