activitypub account system · Issue #7993 · minetest/minetest
github.comIssue type Feature request Summary what if you had an activitypub 2.0 based account system since the items you have and things of that nature are saved on the game server, the only thing the accoun...
They don’t want to get the “First Game of the Fediverse” title
You must log in or register to comment.
A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.
Fediverse is a portmanteau of “federation” and “universe”.
Getting started on Fediverse;
- What is the fediverse?
- Fediverse Platforms
- How to run your own community
- 0 users online
- 4 users / day
- 4 users / week
- 63 users / month
- 295 users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 1.02K Posts
- 13.6K Comments
- Modlog
- mods:
Or maybe they just think it’s a bad idea? Personally, I do too.
Actually not, it allows you to interact from different servers from a single account in one instance
Actually not what? And yes, I know. Apparently they think that’s a bad fit for the thing they’re doing. If you disagree, it’s open source, fork it and implement it.
Another potential technology they could use would be Matrix, so that servers can send commands to each other in real time. It’s better suited for this kind of interactive services than ActivityPub is. Or you could also try XMPP with extensions.
ActivityPub does support extensions (looking at you, ForgeFed, as an example), but you can be right depending on which protocol they could choose
what why?
Didn’t inted to say that anyway but my changes to thread body couldn’t be send to this community’s instance
I edited that out
Edit: I was typing that out because someone thought they would develop their games there